Condos versus Co-ops

March 7, 2007 by Katie Wethman · 1 Comment 

For my first discussion, I want to talk a little bit about co-ops vs. condos. Co-ops are a very ,misunderstood piece of the real estate market. The basic difference is this: Co-ops are corporations in which you buy shares, in exchange for which you are given the right to occupy a unit. Condos are units that you buy, along with an undivided interest interest in the common elements (like hallways, courtyards, pools, and other amenities.) Though it may seem like a small difference, the implications are actually huge. You can see a further discussion of the differences on my web site here.

First, a disclaimer: I am just not a fan of co-ops. Something about having to get approval of a Board before you can buy property just rubs me the wrong way. And the captive financing–by which I mean you can only use the one or, if you’re lucky, two approved lenders, who certainly know that if you want the unit you have to go through them (guess what that does to your rates?), well, it’s just not in keeping with the capitalist spirit. The MBA in me bristles at it. Co-ops are almost always cheaper than comparable condos, and for good reason.

The financing is one disadvantage, but the biggest drawback I’ve learned of is the “land lease” co-ops. Here’s how it works: when the co-op is formed, they only have a lease on the land that the buiding is on. It’s usually very long term, say 99 years. River Place in Rosslyn is like this. Guess what happens when the lease is up? Everyone gets kicked out, and the building and all its improvements (that means your unit too!) revert to the LAND owner. You get nothing! It’s just like having an apartment that you pay to remodel, but when the lease is up, your landlord gets it all at no cost. River Place’s lease is up in about 50 years. That ‘s why the units there are so darn cheap compared to condos…they decline over time as the lease end approaches. I wonder whether people within the 30 year window at the end will even be able to get a loan? It will sure stink to be an owner in that window. Good luck trying to sell!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Ready to start your search? Contact me and we'll meet for coffee to see if it makes sense to work together. Not in the DC area but need a recommendation for a good real estate agent? I have a nationwide network -- just ask me!

  • Google Gmail
  • Digg
  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • PrintFriendly
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Why Are Condos at the Jefferson in Ballston So Cheap? Two words: Retirement Community. The Jefferson is a Sunrise Senior...
  2. FAQ: High Investor (Low Owner-Occupancy) Ratio Condos: How Can I Buy or Sell? One of the most common issues a condo buyer or...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

About Katie

Comments

One Response to “Condos versus Co-ops”

    Trackbacks

    Check out what others are saying about this post...
    1. [...] but try Colonial Village, Taft Towers, Adams House, the Circle, Cardinal House, or the Chatham.   River Place also remains affordable, but since it’s a co-op on a land lease, I don’t recommend it.   (Co-ops are much more common, and not on land leases, in the [...]



    Speak Your Mind

    Tell us what you're thinking...
    and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!